International Criminal Court Demands Arrest of Sudanese President Visiting Summit Meeting in India
NEW DELHI: An India-Africa summit, delayed by the outbreak ebola epidemic in western parts of the continent, will be held here this month but not before New Delhi resolves if it will arrest the Sudanese president as requested by the International Criminal Court (ICC).
The Oct 26-29 summit is expected to be attended by 52 of 54 African countries.
“However there may be some anxious moments as the International Criminal Court has called for India to arrest one of the guests expected to attend, Sudan President Omar al-Bashir, who is wanted for war crimes by the ICC,” The Hindu said on Sunday.
“By arresting and surrendering ICC suspects, India can contribute to the important goal of ending impunity for the world’s worst crimes,” the Office of Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda told The Hindu in a written statement. “It is important to note that United Nations Security Council resolution 1593 urged all states, including non-States parties to the ICC as well regional and other international organisations, to cooperate fully with the ICC. This includes arresting Mr Al-Bashir,” the Prosecutor said.
However, India is not a signatory to the ICC, which is an independent international court not part of the UN system which has 123-member states. Officials told The Hindu there was no question of regarding the ICC’s plea, as the UN Security Council resolution wasn’t internationally binding on non-member States.
“We will be compliant with our statutory international legal obligations,” official MEA spokesperson Vikas Swarup said. Mr Bashir was invited personally by Minister of State for External Affairs V.K. Singh, who travelled to Khartoum on Sept 19, the paper said.
President Omar al-Bashir has been indicted by the ICC for war crimes and genocide during the Darfur conflict of 2003 in which 300,000 people were killed. Among the charges against Mr Bashir is the funding of the pro-Arab Islamist militia, Janjaweed, accused of carrying out systematic ethnic cleansing of black non-Arab African groups who took up arms against the Bashir government.
In June 2015, the South African government faced deep embarrassment as a Pretoria court issued an order to bar Mr Bashir from leaving the country and then ordered his arrest, when he landed in Johannesburg to attend an African Union summit.
However, the government allowed President Bashir to return to Khartoum, and threatened to quit the ICC if it was criticised.
“The AU’s position is clear, and we refuse to let the ICC decide matters of sovereignty,” says Ethiopian Ambassador to India Gennet Zewide, who is the Dean of African Ambassadors in Delhi, adding “What South Africa did was correct, and we don’t anticipate India having any trouble over this issue”.
Sudan Ambassador to India Hassan E. El Talib called the ICC’s statement to India “ridiculous”.
“We are proud that India has taken a leadership position in opposing the Rome statute that set up the ICC,” he told The Hindu. Alleging that the ICC had taken “racist” positions against several African leaders, Ambassador El Talib called the ICC “a club of western countries driven by international NGOs who want to keep certain African countries down”. Significantly, 34 African states are members of the ICC.
Leave a comment
Make sure you enter the (*) required information where indicated. HTML code is not allowed.